State Graduation Rate Goals for High School Accountability
Education Commission of the States • 700 Broadway, Suite 810 • Denver, CO 80203-3442 • 303.299.3600 • Fax: 303.296.8332 • www.ecs.org

State Graduation Rate Goals for High School Accountability


Introduction  Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), all elementary, middle and high schools receiving Title I funds are required to make adequate yearly progress (AYP) or face increasingly rigorous sanctions for each year that a school remains in need of improvement. In addition to test scores in English language arts, math and, effective with the 2007-2008 year science, high schools are required to use graduation rates as the additional indicator in demonstrating adequate yearly progress. (Meeting a graduation rate target cannot help a school with low test scores make AYP but missing the graduation rate target can keep a school from making AYP.) Each state is mandated to set its own graduation rate target and the method it will use to calculate the state graduation rate, both of which must be approved by the U.S. Department of Education.

Criteria for state definition of graduation rate:To be approved by the U.S. Department of Education, each state's graduation rate definition and calculation method had to meet the following criteria:

--Calculate the percentage of students, measured from the beginning of the school year, who graduate from public high school with a regular diploma (not including a GED or any other diploma not fully aligned with the state’s academic standards) in the standard number of years; or,
--Use another more accurate definition that has been approved by the U.S. Secretary of Education; and
--Must avoid counting a dropout as a transfer.

In addition, graduation rate is included (in the aggregate) for AYP, and disaggregated (as necessary) for use when applying the exception clause to make AYP.

Graduation rate targets:Baseline targets and growth targets: Thirty-five states set graduation rate targets for 2002-2003 that do not change through the 2013-2014 school year, when all schools are expected to make AYP. By contrast, 13 states and the District of Columbia set goals that require schools to meet increasingly higher targets until 2013-2014. Three additional states, Iowa, Kansas and Tennessee, maintain relatively stable goals until 2013-2014, in which Iowa's target will increase from the statewide average to 95%, Kansas' target will rise from 75% to 95% and Tennessee's will grow from 90% to 100%.

2005-2006 state graduation rate goals vary considerably, from 50% in Nevada to 95% in Indiana. However, due to the differences in how states calculate graduation rates, it is not possible to make simple comparisons of graduation rate goals from one state to the next. For example, while both Hawaii and Vermont have a 75% graduation rate target for the 2005-2006 school year, Vermont's graduation rate is calculated using a 2-year average, while Hawaii's uses one year of school data. Vermont uses a five-year departure classification definition which calculates the number of dropouts and transfers in over a five-year period, while Hawaii uses a 4-year cohort definition, which essentially calculates the number of high school graduates minus the number of ninth-graders four years earlier--resulting in potentially very different graduation rate figures for each state.

"Improvement" or "maintainance" as a proxy for meeting graduation rate targets: ECS has identified 32 states that allow high schools that have not met the state's graduation rate target to still make AYP if they demonstrate progress--generally described as improvement from the previous year's graduation rate. Twenty-five of these 32 states allow any progress to be made to make AYP; three states (Arkansas, Maryland and North Carolina) require .1% improvement from the previous year; 2 states (Arizona and Florida) require 1% growth over the prior year's graduation rate; and Washington requires high schools not meeting the state target to demonstrate a 2% increase over the previous year. Three states--Delaware, New Mexico and South Carolina--allow a high school to make AYP if the school's graduation rate is below the state target but equal to the school's graduation rate in the previous school year. Missouri requires high schools to make progress toward an 85% graduation rate, but upon attaining it, allows schools to make AYP by maintaining this rate.

Multi-year averages: Six states allow high schools to make adequate yearly progress based on multi-year averages. California permits high schools to reach graduation rate targets by improving their rate by 0.2% over a two-year average. Oregon allows schools to make AYP using a two-year average, whereas in Vermont graduation rates are calculated only using a two-year average. New Mexico and South Carolina allow for a three-year average (current year and two previous years), while Tennessee allows high schools to meet the 90% graduation rate target using the most recent two years' data or a three-year rolling average.

States without uniform statewide target: A handful of states do not set a uniform statewide target from year to year. Arkansas' graduation rate target is defined as one standard deviation below the mean (86.74167%). Florida requires high schools to make 1% improvement over the previous year without setting a minimum statewide numerical target. Iowa annually sets its graduation target as the average of the current school year's graduation rate. Missouri requires schools to make improvement until they reach an 85% graduation rate, at which point schools must maintain or exceed the 85% graduation rate. New Jersey's target is the current state average, provided this average does not dip below 90%.

Methods of calculating graduation rates:A description of various methods of calculating graduation rates follows the table below.

These data were collected in February-March 2006 from U.S. Department of Education approved state accountability workbooks, decision letters documenting changes to state accountability workbooks, and, where necessary, communications with state education agency staff.

This database was compiled by Jennifer Dounay, project manager, ECS High School Policy Center. For questions, additions or corrections: 303.299.3689 or jdounay@ecs.org.


Graduation rate target for 2005-2006 Using NCES 4-year cohort definition State has incremental goals towards 2014 target
Alabama 90%
or improvement
90%
or improvement
For 2004-05, 10% drop-out rate or improvement from previous year. No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Alaska 55.58% 55.58% 55.58% No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Arizona 70.50% 71%
or 1% improvement over previous year
71%
or 1% improvement over previous year
Yes Yes No No
Arkansas If more than one standard deviation below the mean (86.74167), school will not meet adequate yearly progress – unless improvement from previous year. One standard deviation or less below the mean (86.74167)
or improvement from previous year
One standard deviation or less below the mean (86.74167)
or improvement from previous year
No

Other definition (not departure or cohort)
No

Other definition (not departure or cohort)
No No
Colorado 55.30% 55.30% 55.30% Yes Yes No No
Connecticut 70% or annual improvement 70%
or annual improvement
70%
or annual improvement
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Delaware 75%
School Year Graduation Target
2003-04: 75%
2004-05: 76.5%
2005-06: 78%
2006-07: 79.5%
2007-08: 81%
2008-09: 82.5%
2009-10: 84%
2010-11: 85.5%
2011-12: 87%
2012-13: 88.5%
2013-14: 90%
78%
School must (1) meet state target for that year, (2) maintain its graduation rate, or (3) show improvement from previous year
78%
School must (1) meet state target for that year, (2) maintain its graduation rate, or (3) show improvement from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2003-04: 75%
2004-05: 76.5%
2005-06: 78%
2006-07: 79.5%
2007-08: 81%
2008-09: 82.5%
2009-10: 84%
2010-11: 85.5%
2011-12: 87%
2012-13: 88.5%
2013-14: 90%
Yes:
2003-04: 75%
2004-05: 76.5%
2005-06: 78%
2006-07: 79.5%
2007-08: 81%
2008-09: 82.5%
2009-10: 84%
2010-11: 85.5%
2011-12: 87%
2012-13: 88.5%
2013-14: 90%
District of Columbia 2005 = 73% 2006 = 76% 2007 = 79% 2008 = 82% 2014 = 100%
Notes/Citations: Found at: District of Columbia Strategic Plan: May 2005, http://www.k12.dc.us/dcps/frontpagepdfs/strategicPlan2005/Strategic%20plan%20focus.pdf
76% 76% No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2004-2005: 73%
2005-2006: 76%
2007-2007: 79%
2007-2008: 82%
2014: 100%
Yes:
2004-2005: 73%
2005-2006: 76%
2007-2007: 79%
2007-2008: 82%
2014: 100%
Florida 1% improvement 1% improvement over previous year 1% improvement over previous year Yes Yes No No
Georgia 60% or improvement 60%
or improvement over previous year
60%
or improvement over previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Hawaii 70% 75% 75% Yes Yes Yes:
2001-2002 through 2003-2004: 70%
2004-2005 through 2006-2007: 75%
2006-2007 through 2009-2010: 80%
2010-2011 through 2012-2013: 85%
2013-2014: 90%
Yes:
2001-2002 through 2003-2004: 70%
2004-2005 through 2006-2007: 75%
2006-2007 through 2009-2010: 80%
2010-2011 through 2012-2013: 85%
2013-2014: 90%
Idaho 90% by 2012-2013 or improvement 90%
or improvement
90%
or improvement
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Illinois 65%, increasing annually as follows:
2005: 67%
2006: 69%
2007: 72%
2008: 75%
2009: 78%
2010: 80%
2011: 82%
2012: 84%
2013-2014: 85%
69% 69% Yes Yes Yes:
2002-2003: 65%
2003-2004: 66%
2004-2005: 67%
2005-2006: 69%
2006-2007: 72%
2007-2008: 75%
2008-2009: 78%
2009-2010: 80%
2010-2011: 82%
2011-2012: 84%
2012-2013 and 2013-2014: 85%
Yes:
2002-2003: 65%
2003-2004: 66%
2004-2005: 67%
2005-2006: 69%
2006-2007: 72%
2007-2008: 75%
2008-2009: 78%
2009-2010: 80%
2010-2011: 82%
2011-2012: 84%
2012-2013 and 2013-2014: 85%
Indiana 95% 95% 95% No

Other (not 4-year cohort or departure classification definition)
No

Other (not 4-year cohort or departure classification definition)
No No
Iowa 89.4% in 2003-2004

At least one of the following criteria must be met:
1. District rate is greater than or equal to state goal.
2. District rate falls within Confidence Interval.
3. District rate has improved from previous year.
State will determine 2005-2006 target in March 2006
Annually calculated target is average of current school year's statewide rate.
Goal for 2013-2014 is 95%.
State will determine 2005-2006 target in March 2006
Annually calculated target is average of current school year's statewide rate.
Goal for 2013-2014 is 95%.
No

Departure classification definition

Notes/Citations: 2006 legislation requires districts and accredited nonpublic schools to report graduation rates using the 4-year cohort method encouraged by the National Governors Association. Legislation does not indicate date by which this method must be adopted.
No

Departure classification definition

Notes/Citations: 2006 legislation requires districts and accredited nonpublic schools to report graduation rates using the 4-year cohort method encouraged by the National Governors Association. Legislation does not indicate date by which this method must be adopted.
No

But ultimate goal is 95% in 2013-2014.
No

But ultimate goal is 95% in 2013-2014.
Kansas 75% or improvement 75%
or improvement
75%
or improvement
Yes Yes No

But ultimate goal is 95% in 2013-2014.
No

But ultimate goal is 95% in 2013-2014.
Kentucky 2004: 75.50% 2005: 77.75% 2006: 80.00% 2007: 82.25% 2008: 84.50% 2009: 86.75% 2010: 89.00% 2011: 91.25% 2012: 93.50% 2013: 95.75% 2014: 98.00% 80% 80% No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2001-2002: 71%
2002-2003: 73.25%
2003-2004: 75.50%
2004-2005: 77.75%
2005-2006: 80.00%
2006-2007: 82.25%
2007-2008: 84.50%
2008-2009: 86.75%
2009-2010: 89.00%
2010-2011: 91.25%
2011-2012: 93.50%
2012-2013: 95.75%
2013-2014: 98.00%
Yes:
2001-2002: 71%
2002-2003: 73.25%
2003-2004: 75.50%
2004-2005: 77.75%
2005-2006: 80.00%
2006-2007: 82.25%
2007-2008: 84.50%
2008-2009: 86.75%
2009-2010: 89.00%
2010-2011: 91.25%
2011-2012: 93.50%
2012-2013: 95.75%
2013-2014: 98.00%
Louisiana 90% (Non-dropout rate) 90% (Non-dropout rate) 90% (Non-dropout rate) No

"Other" definition (dropout rate)
No

"Other" definition (dropout rate)
No No
Maine 60% 63% 63% No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2001-2002 and 2002-2003: 60%
2003-2004 and 2004-2005: 62%
2005-2006: 63%
2006-2007: 64%
2007-2008: 65%
2008-2009: 66%
2009-2010: 67%
2010-2011: 69%
2011-2012: 71%
2012-2013: 73%
2013-2014: 75%
Yes:
2001-2002 and 2002-2003: 60%
2003-2004 and 2004-2005: 62%
2005-2006: 63%
2006-2007: 64%
2007-2008: 65%
2008-2009: 66%
2009-2010: 67%
2010-2011: 69%
2011-2012: 71%
2012-2013: 73%
2013-2014: 75%
Maryland 81% in 2004 or show improvement over the previous year of one tenth of one percent.Increasing intermediate targets in years 2005, 2008 and 2011, with ultimate goal of 90%(3% standard for dropout rate). 83.24%
or .1% improvement over previous year
83.24%
or .1% improvement over previous year
No

Departure classification definition
Notes/Citations: 2006 legislation requires the state to implement the NCES 4-year cohort definition by October 2011.
No

Departure classification definition
Notes/Citations: 2006 legislation requires the state to implement the NCES 4-year cohort definition by October 2011.
Yes:
2002-2003: 81%
2004-2005 and 2005-2006: 83.24%
2007-2008: 85.5%
2010-2011: 87.75%
2013-2014: 90%
Yes:
2002-2003: 81%
2004-2005 and 2005-2006: 83.24%
2007-2008: 85.5%
2010-2011: 87.75%
2013-2014: 90%
Massachusetts Interim indicator is the grade 12 “competency determination” rate –passing state MCAS tests as a prerequisite for high school graduation – for 2003 and 2004 = 70%. Will begin reporting graduation rates in 2006-07. No current target but plans to set.

2006-2007 graduation data will determine 2007 AYP

Interim indicator is 70% grade 12 “competency determination” rate, i.e., number of 12th-graders who graduate from high school having passed the ELA and math MCAS assessments.
No current target but plans to set.

2006-2007 graduation data will determine 2007 AYP

Interim indicator is 70% grade 12 “competency determination” rate, i.e., number of 12th-graders who graduate from high school having passed the ELA and math MCAS assessments.
No

Methodology has not been finalized. State anticipates reporting on such methodology following the 2006 school year when five complete years of student-level data will be available.
No

Methodology has not been finalized. State anticipates reporting on such methodology following the 2006 school year when five complete years of student-level data will be available.
Not at this time Not at this time
Michigan 80% for 2002-03; 85% for 2005-06; 90% for 2008-09; 90% in effect through 2013-14. Or, if, over a period of two years, reduce by 10% the percentage of students representing the gap between the 85% target and the school’s actual rate (“safe harbor”). (Example: school attendance rate: 70%; 85% minus 70% = 15% gap; 15 times 10% = 1.5. School target becomes 71.5% in order to make AYP.) 85% 85% Yes

4-year cohort will first be used in 2006. Prior to 2006, departure classification definition used.
Yes

4-year cohort will first be used in 2006. Prior to 2006, departure classification definition used.
Yes:
2002-03 through 2004-2005: 80%
2005-06 through 2007-2008: 85%
2008-09 through 2013-2014: 90%
Yes:
2002-03 through 2004-2005: 80%
2005-06 through 2007-2008: 85%
2008-09 through 2013-2014: 90%
Minnesota 80% or growth toward it. 80%
or improvement
80%
or improvement
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Mississippi 72% or an increase from prior year. 72%
or an increase from prior year
72%
or an increase from prior year
Yes Yes No No
Missouri 85% graduation rate Annual improvement until 85%, and then maintain at 85% or better. Annual improvement until 85%, and then maintain at 85% or better. No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Montana No data found. 80%
or improvement toward 80% from previous year
80%
or improvement toward 80% from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Nebraska The graduation rate goal is higher than the state average. In 2003, it was 83.97%.
Notes/Citations: Found at: UPDATE: Guidance for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), http://www.nde.state.ne.us/stars/impl/aypguidelinesupdated.pdf
83.97%
or improvement from previous year
83.97%
or improvement from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Nevada The graduation rate target rate for AYP comparisons is 50 percent. 50%
or improvement over previous year
50%
or improvement over previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
New Hampshire New Hampshire has not incorporated graduation rates as their other indicator for high school accountability. New Hampshire currently uses drop-out rates as the state definition of graduation rate. Not available at this time Not available at this time No

"Other" rate. Currently reports dropout instead of graduation, but intends to transition to a graduation rate definition consistent with NCLB requirements.
No

"Other" rate. Currently reports dropout instead of graduation, but intends to transition to a graduation rate definition consistent with NCLB requirements.
Yes:
2007: 75.2%
2008-2010: 79.2%
2011: 83.1%
2012: 87%
2013: 90.9%
2014: 95%
Yes:
2007: 75.2%
2008-2010: 79.2%
2011: 83.1%
2012: 87%
2013: 90.9%
2014: 95%
New Jersey Until the 2005 school year, the graduation rate goal was a 0.5 percent decrease in the dropout rate. 90% or state average if higher than 90%
or improvement from previous year
90% or state average if higher than 90%
or improvement from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
New Mexico A school will meet adequate yearly progress if they achieve a 90 percent graduation rate. One of these three targets:

(1) 90% graduation rate or
(2) meeting or exceeding the previous year’s rate or
(3) equal to or exceeding 3-year average.
One of these three targets:

(1) 90% graduation rate or
(2) meeting or exceeding the previous year’s rate or
(3) equal to or exceeding 3-year average.
Yes

First 4-year cohort data available at end of 2006-2007 school year.
Yes

First 4-year cohort data available at end of 2006-2007 school year.
No No
New York For a school to make adequate yearly progress the drop-out rate must be less than 5 percent. 55% 55% Yes

First 4-year cohort data available at end of 2006-2007 school year.
Yes

First 4-year cohort data available at end of 2006-2007 school year.
No No
Federal Law
North Carolina Yearly progress is defined as an increase in the graduation rate of 0.1 percent, upto a final graduation rate goal of 90 percent. 90%
or .1% improvement from previous year
90%
or .1% improvement from previous year
No

"Other" method: elapsed time between 8th grade end-of-grade (EOG) tests and diploma receipt, with schools manually recording data for students who did not take 8th grade EOG (transfers from out of state and from private schools).
No

"Other" method: elapsed time between 8th grade end-of-grade (EOG) tests and diploma receipt, with schools manually recording data for students who did not take 8th grade EOG (transfers from out of state and from private schools).
No No
North Dakota North Dakota has a target graduation rate of 91.5 percent. 89.9% through 2004-2005, then TBD 89.9% through 2004-2005, then TBD No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
2001-02 through 2004-2005: 89.9%
2005-2006 through 2013-2014: TBD

Notes/Citations: Beginning 2005, target graduation rate recalculated using the 20% ranking rule for graduation rates.
2001-02 through 2004-2005: 89.9%
2005-2006 through 2013-2014: TBD

Notes/Citations: Beginning 2005, target graduation rate recalculated using the 20% ranking rule for graduation rates.
Ohio Ohio’s initial threshold for graduation rate will be the rate for the district at the top of the bottom quintile of enrollment when districts are ranked from lowest to highest graduation rates. At the end of school years 2010-11 and 2012-13 the graduation rate will be raised by one-third of the gap between the initial threshold rate and 100 percent. For example, if the initial threshold graduation rate is 70 percent, then the threshold will become 80 percent at the end of 2010-11 and 90 percent at the end of 2012-13. 73.6%
or improvement over previous year
73.6%
or improvement over previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes.

At the end of school years 2010-11 and 2012-13 will be raised by one-third of the gap between the initial threshold rate and 100%. For example, if the initial threshold graduation rate is 70 percent, then the threshold will become 80 percent at the end of 2010-11 and 90 percent at the end of 2012-13.
Yes.

At the end of school years 2010-11 and 2012-13 will be raised by one-third of the gap between the initial threshold rate and 100%. For example, if the initial threshold graduation rate is 70 percent, then the threshold will become 80 percent at the end of 2010-11 and 90 percent at the end of 2012-13.
Oklahoma The graduation rate goal is 68.8 percent. 68.8% or improvement from previous year

School completion component score that is 1.5 standard deviations below the mean or improvement over previous year.
68.8% or improvement from previous year

School completion component score that is 1.5 standard deviations below the mean or improvement over previous year.
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Oregon The criterion for making AYP will be the inverse of the dropout rate standard used on existing state report cards or measurable progress towards that goal. In the 2003-04 school year the graduation rate goal was 68.1 percent. 68.1%
or two-year weighted average
68.1%
or two-year weighted average
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Pennsylvania Schools with 80 percent graduation rate meet state AYP demands. 80%
or improvement from previous year
80%
or improvement from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Rhode Island The state has a graduation rate goal of 95 percent in the 2013-14 school year. 75.30% 75.30% No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2002-2003 and 2003-2004: 71.4%
2004-2005 through 2006-2007: 75.3%
2007-2008 through 2009-2010: 79.2%
2010-2011: 83.1%
2011-2012: 87%
2012-2013: 90.9%
2013-2014: 95%

Notes/Citations: New baseline will be set for the graduating class of 2007 based on accumulated data from the student roster tracking method. The graduation rate target for 2013-14 will continue to be 95%.
Yes:
2002-2003 and 2003-2004: 71.4%
2004-2005 through 2006-2007: 75.3%
2007-2008 through 2009-2010: 79.2%
2010-2011: 83.1%
2011-2012: 87%
2012-2013: 90.9%
2013-2014: 95%

Notes/Citations: New baseline will be set for the graduating class of 2007 based on accumulated data from the student roster tracking method. The graduation rate target for 2013-14 will continue to be 95%.
South Carolina South Carolina has a 100 percent graduation rate goal in the 2013-14 school year. 88.3%
or
(2) equals or exceeds previous year's graduation rate, or
(3) 3-year average equals or exceeds previous year's rate
88.3%
or
(2) equals or exceeds previous year's graduation rate, or
(3) 3-year average equals or exceeds previous year's rate
Yes Yes No No
South Dakota Adequate yearly progess will be measured at 90 percent. 80%
or improvement over previous year
(Target reduced from 90% to 80% in August 5, 2005 decision letter.)
80%
or improvement over previous year
(Target reduced from 90% to 80% in August 5, 2005 decision letter.)
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Tennessee Until the 2012-2013 School Year, Tennessee has a 90% Graduation Rate Target. In the 2013-2014 School Year, Tennessee targets a 100% Graduation Rate. 90%
or improvement based on either:
(1) current year,
(2) the most recent two years’ worth of data, or
(3) a three-year rolling average.

Beginning in 2006, the Department will apply previous-year graduation rates to AYP. In the transition year between using current-year and previous-year graduation rates, the Department will use the event dropout rate for AYP. State board at June 20, 2005 meeting approved a event dropout rate for AYP purposes of 5%.
90%
or improvement based on either:
(1) current year,
(2) the most recent two years’ worth of data, or
(3) a three-year rolling average.

Beginning in 2006, the Department will apply previous-year graduation rates to AYP. In the transition year between using current-year and previous-year graduation rates, the Department will use the event dropout rate for AYP. State board at June 20, 2005 meeting approved a event dropout rate for AYP purposes of 5%.
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2002-2003 through 2012-2013: 90%
2013-2014: 100%
Yes:
2002-2003 through 2012-2013: 90%
2013-2014: 100%
Texas For the 2006 School Year Texas demands a 75% Completion Rate to be deemed Academically Acceptable. Texas expects the Academically Acceptable Completion Rate to raise to 85%.
Notes/Citations: See, Accountability System for 2005 and Beyond: Commissioner of Education Final Decisions, available at: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2005/statefinal.pdf
70%
or improvement
70%
or improvement
Yes Yes No No
Utah Utah established 85.7% as their graduation rate goal. The 85.7% graduation rate is a constant figure.
Notes/Citations: This data is derived from the 2004 State of Utah Consolidated State Application Accountability Workbook.
85.7%
or improvement from previous year

Notes/Citations: 93% attendance rate (or improvement) used as a proxy for graduation rate until 2007.
85.7%
or improvement from previous year

Notes/Citations: 93% attendance rate (or improvement) used as a proxy for graduation rate until 2007.
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Vermont Criteria for not making AYP would be having 15 percent or more of students in Below the Standard and Little or No Evidence. 75% based on two-year average 75% based on two-year average No

5-year departure classification definition
No

5-year departure classification definition
No No
Virginia From a starting point of 67.2% in 2001-2002, Virginia has a graduation rate goal of 100% in 2013-2014. 57% 57% No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Yes:
2001-2002 through 2005-2006: 57%
2006-2007 to 2013-2014: TBD
Interim goal is to increase graduation rate 2% each year from FY 2005 through FY 2008.
Yes:
2001-2002 through 2005-2006: 57%
2006-2007 to 2013-2014: TBD
Interim goal is to increase graduation rate 2% each year from FY 2005 through FY 2008.
Washington The Washington graduation rate goal is currently at 66%. By the 2013-2014 the graduation rate goal is 85%. 67%
or 2% improvement over previous year

Notes/Citations: High schools that do not serve grade 12 will have their school-wide annual dropout rate as the other indicator. Dropout rate must be 7% or less or below the previous year’s rate.
67%
or 2% improvement over previous year

Notes/Citations: High schools that do not serve grade 12 will have their school-wide annual dropout rate as the other indicator. Dropout rate must be 7% or less or below the previous year’s rate.
Yes Yes Yes:
2001-2002 through 2004-2005: 66%
2005-2006: 67%
2006-2007: 68%
2007-2008: 69%
2008-2009: 70%
2009-2010: 73%
2010-2011: 76%
2011-2012: 79%
2012-2013: 82%
2013-2014: 85%
Yes:
2001-2002 through 2004-2005: 66%
2005-2006: 67%
2006-2007: 68%
2007-2008: 69%
2008-2009: 70%
2009-2010: 73%
2010-2011: 76%
2011-2012: 79%
2012-2013: 82%
2013-2014: 85%
West Virginia Ninety percent (90%) of ninth graders will graduate from high school. 80%
or improvement from previous year
80%
or improvement from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Wisconsin High schools will be required to meet the target of 90% of the average statewide graduation rate, or growth. 90% of the statewide average for 2001-02 (81.75%)
or progress from previous year

Notes/Citations: In 2001-02 the statewide average graduation rate was 90.83%.
90% of the statewide average for 2001-02 (81.75%)
or progress from previous year

Notes/Citations: In 2001-02 the statewide average graduation rate was 90.83%.
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
Wyoming Wyoming has an 80% Graduation Rate Standard. 80%
or improvement from previous year
80%
or improvement from previous year
No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
No No
American Samoa Unable to locate Unable to locate No state graduation rate goals under NCLB. Unable to locate Unable to locate Unable to locate Unable to locate
Guam Unable to locate Unable to locate Unable to locate Unable to locate Unable to locate Unable to locate
Puerto Rico Puerto Rico is currently receiving technical assistance on their graduation formulas and goals. In the 2002-03 school year the graduation rate goal was 80 percent. Unable to locate Unable to locate No

Departure classification definition
No

Departure classification definition
Unable to locate Unable to locate
Virgin Islands

Methods of calculating graduation rates:For purposes of this report, three methods of calculating graduation rates are identified--a four-year cohort, a departure classification definition and "other" methods, generally unique to the state adopting them.

Four-year cohort: This method compares the number of graduating 12th-graders with the number of 9th graders four years earlier, factoring in students who left the cohort by transfering into or out of the system. According to the 2004 National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) report, National Institute of Statistical Sciences/Education Statistics Services Institute Task Force on Graduation, Completion, and Dropout Indicators, the four-year cohort is capable of calculating a more accurate graduation rate than other methods. However, such a graduation rate calculation requires a longitudinal data system that provides each student with a unique student identifier to track each student's progress through the system over time. Relatively few states currently have such data systems (see the ECS database on state data systems for more state-specific information).

As of the 2005-2006 school year, 11 states are using the cohort definition, and two additional states--New Mexico and New York--will have the first 4-year cohort data at the end of the 2006-2007 school year. According to the September 2005 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, No Child Left Behind Act: Education Could Do More to Help States Better Define Graduation Rates and Improve Knowledge about Intervention Strategies, an additional 18 states plan to use the cohort definition by the 2007-2008 school year. Furthermore, all 50 states have signed on to a compact put forward by the National Governors Association in July 2005 that commits each state to adopting a 4-year cohort graduation rate. (A full report on the NGA's task force on state high school graduation data is also available.)

Departure classification definition: This method, as defined in the September 2005 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, No Child Left Behind Act: Education Could Do More to Help States Better Define Graduation Rates and Improve Knowledge about Intervention Strategies, is used in 31 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. As succinctly defined in the GAO report, "Essentially, this definition looks back from a 12th grade class at those who (1) graduated (regardless of when they started high school), (2) dropped out in 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades (including those who enrolled in GED programs) and (3) did not graduate, but received some form of alternative completion certificate." This definition makes it possible to determine a graduation rate without a data system tracking individual students through the four years of high school.

"Other" definitions: Five states have graduation rate definitions that do not fit into the above categories. The table above provides a brief definition of each of these definitions.

Special populations and alternative schools: Some states' approved accountability workbooks and decision letters refer to the fact that students with disabilities, English language learners, and, in the case of Washington State, migrant students, may require more than 4 years to complete a high school diploma. Generally speaking, the U.S. Department of Education has granted states requesting additional time for such students to allow schools and IEP teams to provide additional time on a case-by-case basis. Relevant language from approved accountability workbooks and decision letters has been collected in a separate ECS document. In addition, a handful of states have received approval from the U.S. Department of Education to modify graduation rate criteria for students in alternative school settings or high schools that do not include grade 12. These provisions are listed in the "Notes" section following the table below.

Notes:California: For high schools without a graduation rate (e.g., only grades 9 and 10) or high schools with a primary mission of returning students to a regular classroom environment in a comprehensive high school: • For high schools administered by a district, the department of education will assign them the district graduation rate. • For direct-funded charter high schools, the department will assign the graduation rate of the charter authorizer, unless the charter authorizer does not have a graduation rate, in which case the countywide graduation rate of the county in which the school is located will be assigned. • For high schools administered by county offices of education, the department will assign the countywide graduation rate.

Georgia: Once new student information system is in place, state will focus on longitudinal tracking of individual students and will no longer set triennial goals. (per July 1, 2005 decision letter)

Kentucky: Allows students completing high school in four or less years to obtain a standard diploma as graduates. (February 2, 2004 decision letter)

Maine: An individual student will be counted as a dropout only once within five years of enrolling in ninth grade in a specific school. (August 31, 2004 decision letter)

Maryland: 2006 H.B. 71 (MD. CODE ANN., EDUC. § 7-203.2) authorizes the state to grant additional time to graduation for students with disabilities, limited English proficient students, and "other students when educationally appropriate based on an individualized review of a student's pathway to graduation."

Minnesota: Minnesota will work towards a system that is able to identify the number of years that students have been in high school and adjust the graduation rate accordingly. (Consolidated State Application Accountability Workbook, updated July 20, 2005)

New York: An exception to the 4-year cohort graduation rate determination will be made for high schools where a majority of students participate in a State-approved five-year program that results in the receipt of certification in a career or technology field or in a program that results in the awarding of an Associates degree in addition to a high school diploma. For those schools, the graduation rate will be the percentage of those students defined in Conditions 1 and 2 who earned a regular high school diploma no later than the end of year 5.

North Dakota: North Dakota will apply a one-year lag to the additional indicators for the 2003-04 and 2004-05 school years for attendance, and the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years for graduation rate. No schools or districts will be held in double jeopardy. If they miss the attendance target in 2003-04, they will not be considered as missing AYP in 2004-05 because doing so would put them in school improvement based on one year's data. (August 10, 2005 decision letter)

Washington: To encourage schools to serve students who remain in school beyond 4 years, a separate graduation rate is calculated that includes students who graduate in more than 4 years, and this rate may be used for AYP purposes. Both the on-time and extended graduation rates will be reported. (September 1, 2005 decision letter). State will also report and use for accountability purposes dropout rates for high schools (those without a 12th grade) without the capability to graduate students.

Wyoming: Will review the graduation rate for very small high schools. Small schools with fewer than thirty exiters will be examined individually to ensure a valid decision. This examination will include an examination of past trend data utilizing a trend line of three years data to ensure positive progress is being demonstrated in graduation rate over time. (July 1, 2004 decision letter)

© 2016 by the Education Commission of the States (ECS). All rights reserved. ECS is the only nationwide, nonpartisan interstate compact devoted to education.
To request permission to excerpt part of this publication, either in print or electronically, please contact the Education Commission of the States’ Communications Department at (303) 299.3609 or askinner@ecs.org.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy